Secrets Of The Dead; A Novel Of Mummies And Ancient Curses
by Simon Clark [Severn House HB, 1994, 217pp]
In 1997 I
read my first and until-now only novel of Yorkshire-born author Simon Clark. It
was his third novel, Darker, and was
about an ancient invisible horror that squashed people flat. It was also very
poorly written, poorly edited and proofread, and poorly everything. It was a
pretty crap book [there was even a large error on the first page] and just gave
every indication of being a rush-job, possibly of an earlier manuscript by
Clark that had been quickly polished off and published to cash in on the
success of his first two novels. Darker
is among the worst horror novels I have ever read, and it single-handedly put
me off Clark for over 20 years. Then, on a trip to my local library recently I
noticed a book I’d never heard of before, Secrets
Of The Dead by Simon Clarke. With some trepidation I borrowed it and over
the next year constantly renewed it without reading it, perhaps sub-consciously
putting it off. In all I’ve had the book kicking around for over a year, until,
when an e-mail from the library tells me it absolutely definitely can’t be
renewed again and please bring it back so we can confirm you haven’t eaten it
or something, I put my current book down and started, finally, reading the
thing, finishing it in less than a week. Darker
was pretty terrible, but Secrets Of The
Dead, to my utter surprise, was great fun.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c272/9c2728b114137ffbf5142ca40083aa91c8aafa6a" alt=""
![]() |
Simon Clark |
I really
enjoyed Secrets Of The Dead. When it
began, I wasn’t sure I liked the simple style and Young Adult-flavour but
pretty quickly I found the pages rushing by as I was sucked into the story. It’s
a reasonably quick and easy read, and reminded me a little of a sort of Hammer
Horror style of story, with some creepy incidents and ideas but not extreme
gory horror. The mood does darken towards the end, as a further danger – a real-world
danger – threatens the family, and I thoroughly enjoyed reading the second
half, where the climax only very slightly let me down, but nevertheless I was
satisfied and happy at the time spent reading the book. Clark obviously has a
skill at writing and creating his characters; I was ‘in the zone’ with this book
much more than with many others by supposed better writers. He does have though
a throwback from his earlier style in the amount of repetition in his work –
while it does make the story very easy to understand, he often tells you again
what you’ve just read a few pages ago, just in case you’ve forgotten, which of
course, unless you’re a cabbage, you haven’t. There are also one or two small
editing errors here, including an occasion of a character having the wrong
name. I don’t know what’s up with Clark’s editor and proofreaders but this
problem seems to have plagued his books throughout his career. Nevertheless, it
is barely noticeable here, and my thought is that one last edit or read-through
could have easily smartened out these occasional errors in the text.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c08e/2c08e9322710de1a4f41a0e90d2596b5bbac099d" alt=""